<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>YUTOPIA</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://joshyuter.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://joshyuter.com/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:joshyuter.com,2008-08-04://2</id>
    <updated>2010-03-15T15:47:05Z</updated>
    <subtitle>The Sometimes Updated blog of Rabbi Josh Yuter</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.261</generator>

<entry>
    <title>The R. Moshe Feinstein Eruv Opinion No One Likes Quoting</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://joshyuter.com/archives/2010/03/the_r_moshe_feinstein_eruv_opinion_no_one_likes_quoting.php" />
    <id>tag:joshyuter.com,2010://2.474</id>

    <published>2010-03-15T16:59:29Z</published>
    <updated>2010-03-15T15:47:05Z</updated>

    <summary>Last Saturday night I gave a class as part of the Jewish LES discussion series on the very topic of &quot;Halakhic Ramifications of Eruv Disputes.&quot; Most of the class was an abbreviation of my earlier three part series on eruvin...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Josh</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Halakha" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Jewish" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="New York" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Religion" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://joshyuter.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Last Saturday night I gave a class as part of the <a href="http://www.jewishles.org/">Jewish LES</a> discussion series on the very topic of "Halakhic Ramifications of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eruv">Eruv</a> Disputes."  Most of the class was an abbreviation of my earlier <a href="http://joshyuter.com/shiurim/">three part series</a> on eruvin in general.</p>

<p>The issue of eruv on the Lower East Side is particularly contentious.  R. Moshe Feinstein, a preeminent decisor of Jewish Law, used to live on the Lower East Side and his son and many students of his still do so.  R. Feinstein was particularly strict in prohibiting the construction on any eruv in Manhattan for reasons too complicated to discuss here, and it is allegedly out of allegiance to R. Feinstein's position on eruv which has precluded its construction to this day.</p>

<p>However, R. Moshe Feinstein has another fascinating responsa regarding the opposition of eruvin in Manhattan, though in conversation it is rarely quoted by his most ardent followers.  In response to the question if one ought to protest constructing eruvin in Manhattan, R. Feinstein states that while he personally cannot endorse it, one should not oppose it either since the positions allowing its construction are still legitimate.  By all accounts this ought to be considered a very reasonable, respectful position and were it stated 30 years later might even be classified as "<a href="http://joshyuter.com/archives/2003/09/the_pluralism_equation.php">pluralistic</a>."</p>

<p>Here is the responsa in the original with my translation, for which I assume responsibility for errors.</p>

<p>Regarding the "Kol Korei" issue see this  <a href="http://eruvonline.blogspot.com/2009/07/kol-koreis-versus-rav-moshe-feinstein.html">wonderful post form Eruv Online</a>.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<hr width="85%" />
<div style="text-align: right;"><strong>שו"ת אגרות משה אורח חיים חלק ד סימן פט</strong> 

<p>אם למחות ביד המקילים לעשות עירוב במאנהעטן ג' דחנוכה תשכ"א. מע"כ ידידי החשוב והנכבד הרב הגאון מוהר"ר אליהו יונג שליט"א. </p>

<p>הנה בדבר מאנהעטן הרי בארתי באריכות בספרי אגרות משה או"ח ח"א בסימן קל"ט כל הצדדים שיש להקל ושיש להחמיר, והמסקנא לע"ד דמאנהעטן ל"ד למה שנהגו להקל בשאר מקומות וא"כ אין בידנו להתיר נגד השיטות שאסרו, וגם ראיה גדולה ממה שבירושלים לא עשו עירוב להתיר ולכן איני רואה דבר שישנה דעתי בזה, אבל הא כבר אמרתי שאין בידנו למחות ביד המקילין וכשיתקנו הרי יהיה מותר לאיזה שיטות, גם הם רבנים גדולים ומי ימחה בהם מכיון שסוברים לפי הכרעתם שיכולין לתקן והם ראוים להוראה. אבל אני בעצמי איני יכול לסייע בזה דאף שיהיה תקון לגבי אלו המטלטלים שם ומוציאין מרה"י =מרשות היחיד= לשם שלא כדין ובהתקונים ירויחו שיהיו מותרין לאיזה שיטות, מ"מ הא לעומת זה יהיה קלקול לגבי אנשים כשרים שרוצים לעשות כהוגן ואינם מטלטלין במאנהעטן שמעתה יטלטלו שהוא שלא כדין להרבה שיטות שבארתי. אבל רבנים הסוברין שיש לתקן רשאים לעשות כמו שהם סוברים כדלעיל. ידידו, משה פיינשטיין.<br />
</div></p>

<p><strong>Iggrot Moshe O.C. 4:89</strong><br />
Q. Should we protest those who are lenient regarding erecting an Eruv in Manhattan? (Dec. 16th 1960).<br />
	<br />
A. Regarding the issue of Manhattan, I have already explained in at length in Iggrot Moshe O.C. 1:139 all the sides for leniency and stringency, and the conclusion in my opinion is that Manhattan is not comparable to other places where the practice was to be lenient, and therefore it is not in our hands to be permissive in opposition to those who forbid.  And also there is a great proof that they did not make an Eruv in Jerusalem to be permitted, and therefore I have not seen anything to change my mind on this.  However, I have already said that it is not in our hands to protest those who are lenient such that when they build [an eruv] it is done under the permissibility of those opinions, those too are great rabbis and who can protest them when they are following their opinions which state that [an eruv] can be erected, and those individuals are worthy of making such a halakhic decision re'uyim lehora'ah.  However, I myself cannot support this [putting up an eruv based on those who disagree with me] for even if it was erected for those who are already carrying inappropriately and in putting up an eruv would permit their carrying according to certain authorities, in any event following this logic would negatively impact those kosher/appropriate people who want to do what is proper and not carry in Manhattan, for they would be carrying against the law according to the many sources I have explained.  However, those rabbis who reason that one may erect [an eruv] are permitted to do as they reason as I have mentioned earlier.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>A Pre-Purim Poem</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://joshyuter.com/archives/2010/02/a_pre-purim_poem.php" />
    <id>tag:joshyuter.com,2010://2.473</id>

    <published>2010-03-01T04:24:20Z</published>
    <updated>2010-03-16T01:36:55Z</updated>

    <summary> The following is a sermon I gave at The Stanton St. Shul 02/27/2010 for Erev Purim. If memory serves, I believe I heard the main derash from R. Mordechai Friedman at Yeshivat Har Etzion but the poem is fully...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Josh</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Divrei Torah" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Holidays" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Purim" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Shtick" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://joshyuter.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><br />
<div align="center"><em>The following is a sermon I gave at <a href="http://www.stantonstshul.com">The Stanton St. Shul</a> 02/27/2010 for Erev Purim.  If memory serves, I believe I heard the main derash from R. Mordechai Friedman at Yeshivat Har Etzion but the poem is fully original.</p>

<p>I'm also proud to say this was the first sermon I gave which elicited applause.  Most of my sermons typically evoke a standing ovation, though that's probably due to kaddish.<br />
</em><br />
</div></p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Purim is tonight, as I'm sure you all know,<br />
And we'll reconvene later, despite all the snow.</p>

<p>To hear the megillah read loud and clear<br />
As we've done every Purim for hundreds of years.</p>

<p>And it might seem strange to rehash and repeat<br />
The same text twice a year, which we all must complete.</p>

<p>So where do we look for modern day meaning?<br />
We start with our sages' theological screening.</p>

<p>And so my friends let us now turn to see <br />
The gemara in <a href="http://www.mechon-mamre.org/b/l/l5312.htm">Hullin, 139b</a>.</p>

<p>The question is asked where do we find<br />
Haman in the Torah - meaning Bible - not combined.</p>

<p>Such a question to ask, and few could be greater!<br />
For didn't Haman live a thousand years later?</p>

<p>The question is written "המן מן התורה מנין"<br />
Haman in the Torah? You have to be lyin!</p>

<p>And if you think that the <em>question</em> is hard to believe<br />
The <em>answer</em> refers back to Adam and Eve.</p>

<p>The gemara responds "המן העץ", from the tree<br />
In the Garden of Eden, where we'd all like to be.</p>

<p>Now this tree in question wasn't known for its wood,<br />
But in eating its fruit one knew evil and good.</p>

<p>This tree was unique, denied to God's creations <br />
And we know how this ends, Man succumbs to temptations.</p>

<p>Sadly this gemara offers no explanation<br />
To connect trees to Purim - our final destination.</p>

<p>I'll offer an answer, no need to fear,<br />
Which I heard at some point - though I'm forgetting the year.</p>

<p>Think back as to why our dear Adam and Eve<br />
Felt compelled to partake of this particular tree.</p>

<p>For of all of the trees Eden grew to be had,<br />
They ate from the tree to know good and bad.</p>

<p>The answer in part is from a trait that is hidden,<br />
There is nothing attractive as that which is forbidden.</p>

<p>When we want all the things we know we can't get<br />
We still keep on chasing, and running up debt.</p>

<p>So what caused man to the sin and subsequent woe,<br />
Was the very restriction - that God told them, "no".</p>

<p>Now if you're wondering what will come next,<br />
Let us return to the Megillah, our old Purim text.</p>

<p>Haman, the villain, as you may recall,<br />
Had wealth and had power - he did have it all.</p>

<p>And the people to Haman would all kneel and bow,<br />
But one caused Haman to furrow his brow.</p>

<p>For there was one person, a defiant old Jew <br />
Who did not comply with what he was told to do.</p>

<p>And one could imagine Haman's great frown<br />
When the Jew Moredchai refused to bow down.</p>

<p>It is only from Haman's irrational greed<br />
Which allowed God's ultimate plan to proceed.</p>

<p>For this one simple act of Jewish defiance<br />
Led Esther and Ahashveirosh to form their alliance.</p>

<p>And at the end of the day the Jews won their war,<br />
But come back tonight, if you'd like to hear more.</p>

<p>The point for the moment, or such is my pshat<br />
Is to love what we have more than what we have not.</p>

<p>For we all have our wants, our needs, and desires.<br />
But it's what we don't get which turns us into criers</p>

<p>And we become so obsessed to fulfill all our needs<br />
That it perverts our hearts, our thoughts, and our deeds.</p>

<p>For what else could turn Haman - once next to the crown<br />
To be reduced to some guy, just a hanging around.</p>

<p>So one message for Purim, for how we should live,<br />
Is measured in mitzvot that require us to give.</p>

<p>Mishloach manaot - the baskets of food,<br />
Which we send to our neighbors so as not be rude.</p>

<p>And matanot le'evyonim - the gifts to the poor<br />
For if greed is our sickness, tzedakkah is our cure.</p>

<p>But we now lack the time to discuss every layer,<br />
So we'll turn to page 500 for the Shabbat Mussaf prayer.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The YUTOPIA Sermon Citation Challenge</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://joshyuter.com/archives/2010/02/the_yutopia_sermon_citation_challenge.php" />
    <id>tag:joshyuter.com,2010://2.472</id>

    <published>2010-02-08T17:12:33Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-08T13:34:57Z</updated>

    <summary>Anyone who has heard my sermons knows that I like spicing up my talks with various non-religious references from popular and obscure culture. Perhaps my best/worst line was the following analogy: &quot;The Jewish community is like Soylent Green - it&apos;s...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Josh</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Personal" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Religion" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://joshyuter.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Anyone who has heard my sermons knows that I like spicing up my talks with various non-religious references from popular and obscure culture.  Perhaps my best/worst line was the following analogy: "The Jewish community is like Soylent Green - it's made of people."</p>

<p>I didn't say they were always funny, but they do make sense in context.</p>

<p>Sometimes people get the references, other times they don't, but I've taken the attitude that I'm just going to drop what I can and let people pick up what they may.  </p>

<p>So I'd like to try something new as a challenge.  This week I'll actually take requests - <em>you</em> tell <em>me</em> what references to make (the general the better), and I'll try working it into a coherent sermon.</p>

<p>In other words, hit me with your best shot, and I'll hit you with my best peshat:</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The Power of Finding Freedom</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://joshyuter.com/archives/2010/01/the_power_of_finding_freedom.php" />
    <id>tag:joshyuter.com,2010://2.471</id>

    <published>2010-01-18T23:07:11Z</published>
    <updated>2010-01-18T20:12:07Z</updated>

    <summary>The following is based on my more extemporaneous derasha on 1/16/2010 Parashat Va&apos;eira at The Stanton St. Shul, posted in response to multiple requests. I&apos;ve added annotations and links, though some jokes and cultural references in the original derasha may...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Josh</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Culture" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Divrei Torah" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Jewish" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Parashat Hashavua" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Religion" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://joshyuter.com/">
        <![CDATA[<div align="center"><em>The following is based on my more extemporaneous derasha on 1/16/2010 Parashat Va'eira at <a href="http://www.stantonstshul.com">The Stanton St. Shul</a>, posted in response to multiple requests.  I've added annotations and links, though some jokes and cultural references in the original derasha may have been omitted.  I'll try to reconstruct my delivered thoughts as best as I can, but I was on a roll today and for some things you just have to be there.</em></div>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Let me begin my derasha today by reassuring the congregation.  If in the course of my next contract negotiation, the shul wishes to renew but only on the condition that davening will be moved a half hour later to 10:00am, and that Rabbi Yossi Pollak<sup>1</sup> will return to give a shiur at 9:30am, and for this concession I will be paid $20m a year, I will most happily take the money.</p>

<p>I am of course referring to the recent drama in the unfolding <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tonight_Show_host_and_timeslot_controversy">Late Night Television controversy</a>. As you all know by now, NBC has decided to replace Conan O'Brien after roughly 7 months of hosting The Tonight Show, in order to replace the time slot with Jay Leno.  Conan refused to go along with this new schedule <a href="http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/12/conan-obrien-says-he-wont-do-tonight-show-following-leno/">stating</a> that doing so would damage "the greatest franchise in the history of broadcasting."  For his part, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Zucker">Jeff Zucker</a>, President and CEO of NBC Universal, responded by threatening to keep Conan off the air for <a href="http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/jeff-zucker-threatens-to-ice-conan-ill-keep-you-off-the-air-for-3-12-years/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter">three and a half years</a>. </p>

<p>Few of us can relate to fighting over time slots and how to split hundreds of millions of dollars.  But anyone who has worked in a hierarchical work environment, particularly in corporations, know full well that bosses and superiors do not respond well to being challenged.  It's bad enough when a subordinate fails to follow orders, worse if he publicly defies them causing personal embarrassment and undermining the chain of command.  When his authority is questioned, the superior will often reassert himself with a demonstration of his supposed power, lashing out with violent deeds or words.  For what better way to justify one's own power than with a display of strength or force.</p>

<p>This past week, we saw this sentiment of power and authority expressed in individual's reaction to the horific <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Haiti_earthquake">Haiti earthquake</a>.  One side we have <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fUd0U-ZZZgw">Pat Robertson</a>, no stranger to <a href="http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Pat_Robertson">controversial quotes</a>, explained that the Haitians brought the earthquake upon themselves, having "swore a pact with the devil" to free themselves from French rule years ago.  For his part, actor <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a2ft5JkNWJA">Danny Glover</a> offered a <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,583244,00.html">similar sentiment</a>, blaming the earthquake on global warming.  The parallel in both of these statements is that both imply, "I am associated with a supernatural power - offend at your peril."  I am great because I choose to follow the Right Diety.  If you go against me, you go against my God, who will in turn "<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110912/quotes">strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger</a>" anyone who will oppose him (and by extension, me).</p>

<p>Which brings us to the obvious question: what is the difference between Pat Robertson and Danny Glover on one hand with what we find in this week's parasha?  After all, isn't God trying to enforce Pharoah's compliance with the might of "a strong hand and outstretched arm?"  Doesn't Moshe threaten Pharoah with the various plagues of God's divine strength?</p>

<p>The answer, believe it or not, is "not quite."</p>

<p><a href="http://www.biu.ac.il/JH/Parasha/eng/vaera/yas.html">Prof. Menahem Ben-Yashar notes</a> that throughout the narrative of the exodus, God does not actually refer to his miracles as "<em>makkot</em>" or "plagues" but rather "<em>otot umof'tim</em>" - "signs and wonders."<sup>2</sup>  </p>

<p>To be sure, if you're on the receiving end, "signs and wonders" may be indistinguishable from "plagues" but the difference for our purposes is the <em>intent</em>.  A plague as a punishment implies retribution, but it also implies that one definitively knows God's motivations - one of the limits of <a href="http://joshyuter.com/archives/2004/04/talmudic_theodicy.php">Jewish theodicy</a>.  The term "signs and wonders" accurate describes the event, but without the moral qualifications or implications.  Instead it treats the events as they are, leaving it up to us as humans to respond based on our own inclinations.  Here too we may look towards the tragedy in Haiti where the global response has been mostly <a href="http://www.google.com/relief/haitiearthquake/">altruistic</a>, with Haiti receiving more aid than they have the <a href="http://www.casavaria.com/cafesentido/2010/01/18/5882/haiti-aid-bottleneck-diversify-distribution-routes-targets/">capacity to distribute</a>.</p>

<p>On Monday we will commemorate the life of Dr. Martin Luther King, who perhaps is best known for his famous "<a href="http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/mlkihaveadream.htm">I Have a Dream</a>" speech in which he declared:<blockquote>I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.</blockquote></p>

<p>For Dr. King, this dream was perhaps the best to which he could aspire.  But maybe Torah teaches us to dream even higher.  To not <em>even</em> judge people by the content of their character, but the recognition of "<em>ein dayan yahid ela ehad</em>" - there is no judge who sits alone aside from one (<a href="http://www.shechem.org/torah/avot.html#chap4">M. Avot 4:8</a>).  That we may be able to look at the world and people around us not with the judging eyes to find "plagues" - but to accept the "signs and wonders" all around us. And for those catastrophic events which will inevitably occur, we view them first as opportunities for compassion.  </p>

<p>And I suspect we may take this perspective and an important step in our own paths to freedom.</p>

<p><span class="footnote"><br />
1. Friend, colleague  and my immediate predecessor at The Stanton St. Shul, currently in Westport CT.<br />
2. I highly recommend reading the Prof. Ben-Yashar's full article for the textual references.<br />
</span><br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>YUTOPIA&apos;s Favorite Forgotten Originals</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://joshyuter.com/archives/2010/01/yutopias_favorite_forgotten_originals.php" />
    <id>tag:joshyuter.com,2010://2.470</id>

    <published>2010-01-04T00:48:38Z</published>
    <updated>2010-01-05T02:25:50Z</updated>

    <summary>Whoever cites something in the name of the original source brings redemption to the world1 In my religious and academic lives I have an affinity for tracking down the original sources of ideas. Not surprisingly, this trait extends to other...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Josh</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Music" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://joshyuter.com/">
        <![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><em>Whoever cites something in the name of the original source brings redemption to the world</em><sup>1</sup></div>

<p>In my religious and academic lives I have an affinity for tracking down the original sources of ideas.  Not surprisingly, this trait extends to other areas of geekdom including music.  While there are no shortage of <a href="http://www.secondhandsongs.com/">cover</a> <a href="http://www.coversproject.com/">songs</a> - with more coming every day - there are times when the cover version so completely overshadows the original that only few know whence it came.  </p>

<p>In the interests of promoting music education, I've collected some of my favorite lost originals.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>The Arrows - I Love Rock and Roll</strong><br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/8AT_Pbtyid0&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/8AT_Pbtyid0&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>

<p><strong>Gloria Jones - Tainted Love</strong><br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/NSehtaY6k1U&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/NSehtaY6k1U&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>

<p><strong>The Four Lads - Istanbul</strong><br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/vankaSlfSr0&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/vankaSlfSr0&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>

<p><strong>Otis Redding - Hard to Handle</strong><br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/1ZxN9iQM7OY&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/1ZxN9iQM7OY&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>

<p><strong>Neil Diamond - Red Red Wine</strong><br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ysxw7EON5xc&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ysxw7EON5xc&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>

<p><strong>Louis Prima - Just a Gigolo</strong><br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/CodmlmxpZeQ&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/CodmlmxpZeQ&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>

<p><strong>J.J. Cale - Cocaine</strong><br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/qSzU4zP74ng&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/qSzU4zP74ng&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>

<p><strong>The Slade - Cum On Feel the Noize</strong><br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/va8NNlVcVMI&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/va8NNlVcVMI&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>

<p><strong>Merrilee Rush - Angel of Morning</strong><br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/cbUNVm1k3nU&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/cbUNVm1k3nU&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>

<p><strong>Cat Stevens - The First Cut Is The Deepest</strong> (forgot this one myself)<br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/aBccr-aLu4I&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/aBccr-aLu4I&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>

<p><span class="footnote"><br />
1. I've always loved the irony that many educated Jews are familiar with this quote but do not know to whom it is attributed. To my knowledge the only instance where this citation is itself attributed is <a href="http://www.mechon-mamre.org/b/l/l2901.htm">B. Megillah 15a</a> which records this statement in the name of R. Elazar citing R. Hanina. Cue up <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFGgbT_VasI">Redemption Song</a>.<br />
</span></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Year Of The Heart</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://joshyuter.com/archives/2009/12/year_of_the_heart.php" />
    <id>tag:joshyuter.com,2009://2.469</id>

    <published>2009-12-31T22:33:24Z</published>
    <updated>2009-12-31T20:35:10Z</updated>

    <summary>Preface As part of a New Year&apos;s intellectual cleaning, I came across this post which I had intended to post on my birthday. This was actually the first year I didn&apos;t post anything since I started YUTOPIA nearly 6 years...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Josh</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Personal" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://joshyuter.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Preface</strong></p>

<p>As part of a New Year's intellectual cleaning, I came across this post which I had intended to post on my birthday.  This was actually the first year I didn't post anything since I started YUTOPIA nearly <a href="http://yutopia.blogspot.com/2003_05_18_archive.html">6 years ago</a>.  As for many people, past year has not been the easiest for me on multiple personal levels.  While I will not elaborate on most here, the year is ending with me coming out of a long relationship and reentering the tumultuous waters of <a href="http://joshyuter.com/archives/jewish-dating/">Jewish dating</a>.  This recent emotional adjustment, though unpleasant, has been a motivating factor for reevaluating and revising the thrust of the overdue post below.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<hr / width="85%">Today is the day I turn 32 - meaning "<em>lev</em>" or "heart" in Hebrew.  Sure it doesn't have the appeal of being a big round number or even <a href="http://joshyuter.com/archives/2008/08/in_my_prime.php">prime</a>, but I do find it interesting that my 32nd/lev birthday falls out on the day before <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_B'av">Tu B'Av</a> a day in the Jewish calendar typically associated with love and marriage.  In the final Mishna of Ta'anit (4:8), we find the following description by R. Shimon Ben Gamliel:

<blockquote>R. Shimon B. Gamliel said: there never were in Israel greater days of joy than the 15th of Av and the Day of Atonement. On these days the daughters of Jerusalem used to walk out in white garments which they borrowed in order not to put to shame any one who had none. All these garments required ritual dipping. The daughters of Jerusalem came out and danced in the vineyards exclaiming at the same time, "Young man, lift up your eyes and see what you choose for yourself. Do not set thine eyes on beauty but set thine eyes on [good] family. grace is deceitful, and beauty is vain; but a woman that fears the lord, she shall be praised (Mishlei 31:30). And it further says, give her of the fruit of her hands; and let her works praise her in the gates (31:31)"<sup>2</sup></blockquote>

<p>At first glance R. Shimon B. Gamliel is describing an ancient <em>shidduch</em> scene of women going out to find husbands.  To this day the tradition continues with numerous Shabbat Nachamu Singles Shabbatons.  But to what extent is this Mishna an accurate historical account, or more to the point, is the historical understand of this Mishna really "<em>peshat</em>" in terms of its true intent?  I ask this question not as an academic, but as a longtime single who has given a great deal of thought to dating.  Imagine for a moment the account in this Mishna actually taking place.  Throngs of women dressed in white may seem physically attractive, but also consider being nagged and badgered repeatedly by all of them to get your religious priorities straight.  It would seem to me that this strategy would turn off even the most desperate of men.<sup>3</sup>  Furthermore, if this method was so effective as a <em>shidduch</em> system, why would it occur on the 15th of Av followed by Yom Kippur - only two months later?</p>

<p>One of my favorite interpretations of this Mishna is the one offered by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mircea_Eliade">Mircea Eliade</a>, primarily for the comedic value of sloppy scholarship.  In his classic <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=sqI9AAAAIAAJ&lpg=PP1&dq=myth%20of%20the%20eternal%20return&pg=PA61#v=onepage&q=&f=false">The Myth of The Eternal Return</a> Eliade writes:<br />
<blockquote>It was customary at the time of the Yom Ha-Kippurim<sup>4</sup>, for the girls to go outside the boundaries of the village or town to dance and amuse themselves, and it was on this occasion that marriages were arranged.  But it was also on this day that freedom was allowed to a number of excesses, sometimes even orgiastic, which remind us both of the final phase of the <em><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&search=akitu">akitu</a></em> (also celebrated outside the town) and of the various forms of license that were the rule almost everywhere in the frame of New Year ceremonials(p. 61)</blockquote></p>

<p>My sense is that Eliade likely never read this source - and probably little if any of Rabbinic literature - in the original giving his footnote on this paragraph: "See the references of the Talmud to orgiastic excesses in Raffaele Pettazzoni <em>La confessione dei peccati</em>, II (Bologna, 1935)."  In fairness, Eliade was looking for certain patterns in comparative religion<sup>5</sup> and from this perspective found in our Mishna a parallel example of an fertility renewal ritual common in agrarian societies.</p>

<p>My own read of the Mishna differs from Eliade for obvious reasons, but I do not believe Eliade is completely incorrect.  I suggest that this Mishna does indeed address a theme of renewal, ut instead of reading the Mishna as a sexual or reproductive renewal with agrarian implications, I submit that R. Shimon Ben Gamliel's account is a metaphor for spiritual renewal, the consummation of which being redemption.<sup>6</sup></p>

<p>The first indication comes from the Talmud's explanation for Yom Kippur and Tu B'Av being the designated days for the ritual (Ta'anit 30b-31a).  The Talmud <em>assumes</em> the appropriateness of Yom Kippur because, "it is a day of forgiveness and pardon, and on it the second tablets were given."  Recall that the second tablets were needed after Moshe broke the first set by the sin of the Golden Calf <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus%2032;&version=31;">Sh'mot 32</a>.  The giving of the second tablets indicated that God not only forgave the Jewish people<sup>7</sup> but that he was willing to renew the shattered covenant.  It signified the conclusion of a dark moment in our history and provided the closure needed to move forward to become a stronger nation.</p>

<p>I suggest that we find similar themes in the six opinions the Talmud records for the significance of Tu B'Av:<br />
<ol><li>R. Yehuda in the name of Shmuel - Tu B'Av was the day the twelve tribes were allowed to intermarry with each other</li><li>R. Yosef in the name of R. Nachman - The tribe of Binyamin was permitted to enter the congregation of Jews, specifically to intermarry with the other tribes (See <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Judges%2021;&version=31;">Shofetim 21</a>)</li><li>Rabba bar bar Hana in the name of R. Yohanan - The generation of the desert died out on the 15th of Av</li><li>Ulla - King Hoshea removed the guards that rebel King Yoravam ben Nevat had placed to prevent Jews from going to Jerusalem for festivals (<em>'oleh regel) (<a href="http://www.come-and-hear.com/gittin/gittin_88.html">B. Gittin 88a</a>)</em></li><li>R. Matneh - Those killed at Beitar were permitted to be buried.</li><li>Rabbah and R. Yosef - The end of the season for chopping down trees for the alter (after the 15th of Av the wood does not dry properly)</li></ol></p>

<p>The opinions listed above may be categorized into three pairs, each a variant on the motif of renewal.  The first two positions, the only ones with any reference to marriage, celebrate national unity - the first allowed the Jewish nation to prosper the second repaired a fractured relationship within the nation, both through the institution of marriage and subsequent reproduction.  In contrast the second pair of opinions, number three and five, commemorate the closure provided by death and burials.  The generation of the desert needed to die out before the Jewish people could fulfil its destiny (See <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Numbers%2013;&version=31;">Bamidbar 13</a>), and the nation needed to bury the bodies at Beitar as symbol of closure in the face of the impending exile.  The final pair of #4 and #6 both describe a personal reconnecting with God through the removal of outside interferance, be it from a sinner's restriction or even the noble religious occupation of Temple service.</p>

<p>Now let us turn to the Talmud's description of the "mating ritual's" details.  <a href="http://www.mechon-mamre.org/b/l/l2804.htm">B. Ta'anit 31a</a> specifically recounts that the women would borrow clothing so as not to embarrass each other:</p>

<blockquote>THE DAUGHTERS OF ISRAEL CAME OUT AND DANCED IN THE VINEYARDS. A Tanna taught: Whoever was unmarried repaired thither.

<p>THOSE OF THEM WHO CAME OF NOBLE FAMILIES EXCLAIMED, 'YOUNG MAN etc.' Our Rabbis have taught: The beautiful amongst them called out, Set your eyes on beauty for the quality most to be prized in woman is beauty; those of them who came of noble families called out, Look for [a good] family for woman has been created to bring up a family; the ugly ones amongst them called out, Carry off your purchase in the name of Heaven, only on one condition that you adorn us with jewels of gold.</p>

<p>Ulla Bira'ah said in the name of R. Eleazar: In the days to come the Holy One, blessed be He, will hold a chorus for the righteous and He will sit in their midst in the Garden of Eden and every one of them will point with his finger towards Him, as it is said, And it shall be said in that day: Lo, this is our God, for whom we waited, that He might save us; this is the Lord for whom we waited, we will be glad and rejoice in His salvation.<br />
</blockquote></p>

<p>I suggest that these two paragraphs which conclude the trachtate Ta'anit compliment the theme of renewal.  The calls of the women were understandably tailored to emphasize the women's individual attractive traits, be it wealth, nobility, or simply the opportunity to create a holy union.  And just as one waits to find their mate with which to begin a new life, the righteous similarly wait for the days of redemption.</p>

<p>The Torah is replete with comparing the relationship between God and the Jewish people that of a husband and wife,<sup>8</sup> both of which require the opening of one's heart.  It is only through this process of relationship that we too can feel renewed, and ultamately find our personal redemptions.  </p>

<p>Personally, I'm well aware of the myriad uncertainties in my own future.  But at this point in my life I will try to live the year as one of <em>lev</em>, with the fulness of my heart.</p>

<p><span class="footnote"><br />
1. Sure it's off by a day, but it's not like it hasn't stopped anyone before.<br />
2. Translation modified from Soncino thanks to its copy-paste functionality.<br />
3. Unless of course we view this ritual as preparation for married life.  <br />
4. I have no patience to transcribe his diacritics and/or code them in HTML.<br />
5. As usual, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Patterns-Comparative-Religion-Mircea-Eliade/dp/0803267339/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1249507258&sr=8-1">pun intended</a>.<br />
6. Warning: The following should be taken as <em>midrash</em>.<br />
7. <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus%2032:35;&version=31;">Most of them</a> anyway.<br />
8. See <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=jer%203:14&version=31">Yirmiyahu 3:14</a> for one of many examples.<br />
</span></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Yeshiva vs. University</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://joshyuter.com/archives/2009/12/yeshiva_vs_university.php" />
    <id>tag:joshyuter.com,2009://2.468</id>

    <published>2009-12-31T01:40:22Z</published>
    <updated>2009-12-30T23:51:20Z</updated>

    <summary>Being far removed from my alma mater, it is difficult for me to truly have a sense of what happens on campus anymore and second-hand reports fail to adequately capture the full zeitgeist of the community. The most recent controversy...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Josh</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Academics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Culture" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Jewish" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Religion" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://joshyuter.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Being far removed from my <a href="http://www.yu.edu">alma mater</a>, it is difficult for me to truly have a sense of what happens on campus anymore and second-hand reports fail to adequately capture the full zeitgeist of the community.  The most recent controversy around Yeshiva University involves a forum on "Being Gay in the Orthodox World" and the expected.  The topic of homosexuality in Orthodox Judaism has long been a controversial issue, one which we discussed years ago in "<a href="http://joshyuter.com/archives/2004/06/lonely_men_of_faith.php">Lonely Men of Faith</a>, but it is still considered taboo in certain Orthodox circles.  Case in point, following said forum R. Meir Twersky responded with a public diatribe lambasting the entire event and its participants.  This forum and the aftermath are helpfully recounted in great detail on <a href="http://curiousjew.blogspot.com/">Curious Jew's</a> blog.  Since I did not attend the event nor did I hear R. Twersky's statements firsthand I will not address either specifically.  However, that such a controversy exists demonstrates that even after 123 YU is <em>still</em> struggling with its own identity as a "Yeshiva", "University", and a representative if not champion for "Modern Orthodoxy."</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>The issue at hand is of course determining the boundaries for acceptable discourse.  Engaging in academic discussions often necessitates challenging established religious assumptions and conventions.  For one example, biblical criticism assumes the bible was authored by men whereas the entire religion of Judaism is dependent on the premise of divine authorship.  In a Yeshiva setting, such academic questions or assumptions could not be admitted into any discussion.  </p>

<p>But the world of academia is no less insulated from its own ideological dogmatism.  A 2007 documentary <a href="http://indoctrinate-u.com/pages/welcome.html">Indoctrinate U</a> describes the intimidation and suppression of views not in line with the prevailing (typically liberal) politics of the day. (This movie is worth watching in its entirety - <a href="http://video.yahoo.com/watch/3624795/9994231">Part 1 begins here</a>).  Even the "hard sciences" are not immune.  The recent "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climatic_Research_Unit_e-mail_hacking_incident">climategate"</a> scandal exposed bias and data manipulation in the debate over climate change - where opposition had been derided as "<a href="http://bit.ly/55TA13">climate change skeptics</a>".  </p>

<p>And of course if Yeshiva University aims to define or even represent Modern Orthodoxy, then it must consider the world beyond both the ivory towers of academia and the hallowed walls of the <em>beit midrash</em>.  Given the diverse range of ideologies within global Orthodoxy, this alone appears to be a near impossible task.</p>

<p>Thus the real challenge for Yeshiva University is therefore not merely one of "academic freedom" but one of self-identity.  This question is clearly not simply academic (no pun intended here), but rather it would define the boundaries for appropriate discourse on campus.  A discussion on "Being Gay in the Orthodox World" - would certainly fall within the academic and cultural worlds, even if rejected by the Yeshiva.  Ironically, YU had officially cited "<a href="http://joshyuter.com/archives/2006/09/religious_responsibilities_and_academic_freedom.php"> academic freedom</a>" to justify statements by <a href="http://joshyuter.com/archives/2008/03/the_unmaking_of_a_gadol.php">roshei yeshiva</a> for making statements tolerable in the yeshiva, but inexcusable in academia or parts of the Orthodox world.</p>

<p>If YU does not wish to pigeonhole itself by any of the above definitions, then perhaps there is an alternative solution - the expansion of discourse in all spheres.  Instead of repeatedly engaging in the same arguments of what may be spoken and who has the right to speak, but provide a forum and environment for where even diametrically opposing viewpoints may be discussed, debated, and defended civilly on the merits of one's argument.  </p>

<p>I suggest that such an intellectual culture would ultimately improve the Yeshiva, the University, and of course, Yeshiva University.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>One And Done</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://joshyuter.com/archives/2009/12/one_and_done.php" />
    <id>tag:joshyuter.com,2009://2.467</id>

    <published>2009-12-29T04:18:19Z</published>
    <updated>2009-12-30T14:49:28Z</updated>

    <summary>Halakhic Logic for Waiting One Hour Between Meat and Dairy I&apos;ll skip the usual apologies for neglecting the blog; I&apos;m a &quot;part time&quot; Rabbi and I&apos;ve always believed that real life takes precedence over virtual life. Actually I think I&apos;ve...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Josh</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Divrei Torah" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Halakha" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Jewish" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Religion" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://joshyuter.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Halakhic Logic for Waiting One Hour Between Meat and Dairy</strong></p>

<p>I'll skip the usual apologies for neglecting the blog; I'm a "part time" Rabbi and I've always believed that real life takes precedence over virtual life.  Actually I think I've fulfilled my "virtual" requirements quite nicely on my <a href="http://twitter.com/JYuter">Twitter feed</a>.<sup>1</sup>  Case in point, one Twitter conversation discussed the halakhic topic of waiting to eat dairy foods after consuming meat.  There are <a href=" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milk_and_meat_in_Jewish_law#Eating_dairy_after_meat"> varying cultural traditions</a> regarding the length one must wait ranging from one to six hours but the minimum time of waiting only one hour is the least commonly observed practice.  The reason for this phenomenon is likely the result of social factors - a cultural affinity towards selective stringencies being one of many- than legal hermeneutic.  (The support for longer waiting periods certainly has halakhic support with Rambam (<a href=" http://www.mechon-mamre.org/i/5209.htm">Ma'achalot Assurot 9:28</a>) and Shulhan Aruch (O.C. 89:1) stipulating a 5-6 hour waiting period but Ashkenazi Jews follow these authorities inconsistently).  In this post I will argue that the minimum position of waiting one hour, typically not considered normative, maintains halakhic validity.  </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>We must first begin our discussion with the Talmudic sugya in <a href="<br />
http://www.mechon-mamre.org/b/l/l5307.htm"><br />
B. Hullin 105a</a> which introduces the waiting period (Soncino translation): <br />
<blockquote><div align="right"><br />
בעא מיניה רב אסי מרבי יוחנן: כמה ישהה בין בשר לגבינה? א"ל: ולא כלום; איני, והא אמר רב חסדא: אכל בשר - אסור לאכול גבינה, גבינה - מותר לאכול בשר! אלא, כמה ישהה בין גבינה לבשר? א"ל: ולא כלום. גופא, אמר רב חסדא: אכל בשר - אסור לאכול גבינה, גבינה - מותר לאכול בשר. אמר ליה רב אחא בר יוסף לרב חסדא: בשר שבין השינים מהו? קרי עליה: "הבשר עודנו בין שיניהם". אמר מר עוקבא: אנא, להא מלתא, חלא בר חמרא לגבי אבא, דאילו אבא - כי הוה אכיל בשרא האידנא לא הוה אכל גבינה עד למחר עד השתא, ואילו אנא - בהא סעודתא הוא דלא אכילנא, לסעודתא אחריתא - אכילנא.<br />
</div></p>

<p>R. Assi enquired of R. Johanan: How long must one wait between flesh and cheese? -- He replied. Nothing at all. But this cannot be, for R. Hisda said: If a person ate flesh he is forbidden to eat [after it] cheese, if he ate cheese he is permitted to eat [after it] flesh! -- This indeed was the question. How long must one wait between cheese and flesh? And he replied. Nothing at all.</p>

<p>The [above] text [stated]: 'R. Hisda said: If a person ate flesh he is forbidden to eat [after it] cheese, if he ate cheese he is permitted to eat [after it] flesh'. R. Aha b. Joseph asked R. Hisda: What about the flesh that is between the teeth? -- He quoted [in reply] the verse: While the flesh was yet between their teeth (Bamidbar 11:33).  Mar 'Ukba said: In this matter I am as vinegar is to wine compared with my father. For if my father were to eat flesh now he would not eat cheese until this very hour tomorrow, whereas I do not eat [cheese] in the same meal but I do eat it in my next meal.<br />
</blockquote></p>

<p>This sugya notably does not offer an objective period for waiting between eating meat and dairy<sup>2</sup>, rather implying from Mar Ukva's statement that the minimum time is until the next meal.  Rambam quantifies this delay in light of the biblical reference to the meat stuck between people's teeth:<sup>3</sup>   </p>

<blockquote><div align="right">
מי שאכל בשר בתחלה בין בשר בהמה בין בשר עוף לא יאכל אחריו חלב עד שיהיה ביניהן כדי  שיעור סעודה אחרת והוא כמו שש שעות מפני הבשר של בין השינים שאינו סר בקינוח.
</div>

<p>Someone who eats meat first [i.e. before dairy], be it beef or fowl, may not eat dairy afterwards until the time of another meal, and this is approximately six hours.  This is because of the meet that remains between one's teeth that is not removed with wiping (Rambam Forbidden Foods 9:28).<br />
</blockquote></p>

<p>In contrast, the more lenient opinion of the Tosafot defines "next meal" literally:</p>

<blockquote><div align="right">
לסעודתא אחריתא אכילנא - לאו בסעודתא שרגילין לעשות אחת שחרית ואחת ערבית אלא אפילו לאלתר אם סילק השולחן ובירך מותר דלא פלוג רבנן.
</div>

<p>This does not only apply to the meals which are normally eaten after morning and evening prayers, but even immediately after eating a meal if one has cleared the table and blesses after the meal, the rabbis did not differentiate (Tos. Hullin 105a sv. <em>Le-s'udata aharita achilana</em>). <br />
</blockquote></p>

<p>While R. Yosef Karo rules similar to Rambam, R. Moshe Isserlis not only cites the Tosafists opinion, but asserts, "the accepted practice in these territories is to wait eating meat one hour before eating cheese" (Y.D. 89:1). </p>

<p>According to the Tosafot's literal definition of "next meal," even the practice of waiting one hour would be more than necessary.  However, I suggest that the minimum standard of one hour may still be required in accordance with the Tosafists position based on a halakhic time limit of when a meal ends.</p>

<p><a href=" http://www.mechon-mamre.org/b/h/h11.htm">M. Berachot 8:7</a> discusses the protocol for forgetting to recite birkat hamazon:  <br />
<blockquote><div align="right"><br />
עד אימתי הוא מברך עד כדי שיתעכל המזון שבמעיו<br />
</div><br />
Until when may one bless [birkat hamazon]? Until the time it takes for the food to be digested in his stomach.<br />
</blockquote></p>

<p>Unlike the ambiguous sugya in B. Hullin 105b, the Talmud in B. Berachot 53b does attempt to quantify an otherwise subjective biological condition:</p>

<blockquote>
<div align="right">
עד אימתי הוא וכו'. כמה שיעור עכול? אמר רבי יוחנן: כל זמן שאינו רעב; וריש לקיש אמר: כל זמן שיצמא מחמת אכילתו. אמר ליה רב יימר בר שלמיא למר זוטרא, ואמרי לה רב יימר בר שיזבי למר זוטרא: מי אמר ריש לקיש הכי? והאמר רב אמי אמר ריש לקיש: כמה שיעור עכול - כדי להלך ארבע מילין! - לא קשיא: כאן באכילה מרובה, כאן באכילה מועטת
</div>

<p>UNTIL WHEN CAN HE SAY THE GRACE. How long does it take to digest a meal? -- R. Johanan said: Until he becomes hungry again; Resh Lakish said: As long as one is thirsty on account of the meal. Said R. Yemar b. Shelemia to Mar Zutra, or, according to others R. Yemar b. Shezbi to Mar Zutra: Can Resh Lakish have said this? Has not R. Ammi said in the name of Resh Lakish: How long does it take to digest a meal? Long enough for one to walk four mil? -- There is no contradiction: one statement refers to a light meal, the other to a heavy one (<a href="http://www.come-and-hear.com/berakoth/berakoth_53.html">B. Berachot 53b</a>).<sup>4</sup><br />
</blockquote></p>

<p>In this matter R. Yosef Karo assumes the more subjective measure:<br />
<blockquote><div align="right"><br />
עד אימתי יכול לברך, עד שיתעכל המזון שבמעיו; וכמה שיעורו, כל זמן שאינו רעב  מחמת אותה אכילה, ומשעה שהתחיל להיות רעב, אע"פ שלא נתעכל עדיין לגמרי, כנתעכל לגמרי דיינינן ליה<br />
</div></p>

<p>Until when may one say [birkat hamazon]? Until the food has been digested in his stomach.  And what is its time?  As long as the person is not hungry from that eating.  And from the time he begins to become hungry again, even if the food has not been digested completely [biologically], it is as if it had been digested from his perspective...(O.C. 184:5)<br />
</blockquote></p>

<p>However, there is precedent for quantifying the length of time it takes to walk a mil from other areas of Jewish law.   Perhaps the most recognizable examples are the 18 minutes dough reminds idle before becoming hametz and forbidden on Passover,<sup>5</sup> and certain opinions regarding the beginning of Shabbat.<sup>6</sup>  Therefore, if we assume this designation of 18 minutes to a mil, then based on B. Berachot 53b a meal is halakhically over 72 minutes after the cessation of eating.</p>

<p>Following this line of reasoning, when Mar Ukva establishes the delay between eating meat and dairy as "between meals," R. Yohanan's limit of walking four mil may serve as an upper bound - the maximum time one is considered to be connected to the previous meal - which would amount to 72 minutes, or slightly more than one hour.</p>

<p>To be clear, I am not advocating anyone change their custom, nor am I imposing this interpretation on any earlier halakhic authority.  Rather, my intent is only to apply a halakhic analogy which may assist in quantifying the otherwise ambiguous span of "from meal to meal."  Since halakha elsewhere caps the association with a meal to 72 minutes, I suggest that metric is also applicable towards waiting between meat and dairy.</p>

<p><span class="footnote"><br />
1. Truth be told, one of the biggest contributions Twitter has made to society is that in the old blogging days all that inane chatter would clog up the internet in the form of distinct blog posts.  Thanks to twitter, all that nonsense is relegated to its own <a href="http://xkcd.com/256/">island</a> - though the map should probably be redesigned, but I digress...<br />
2.  Anticipating <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiDmMBIyfsU">Monty Python's Life of Brian</a>, the Talmud's specification of cheese extends to all dairy products. <br />
3. In <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Numbers+11&version=NIV">context</a> this verse discusses the plague brought in response to the Jews' complaining for meat while wandering in the desert.  Interestingly, the "flesh" in this verse refers to quail, which as a type of fowl, is only considered meat rabbinically.  See <a href="http://www.mechon-mamre.org/b/l/l5307.htm">B. Hullin 113a</a>.   <br />
4. Rashi and Tosafot disagree over whether the time it takes one to become thirsty again is shorter than walking the distance of 4 mil (Rashi) or the reverse (Tosafot). <br />
5. See Shulhan Aruch O.C. 459:2 who evaluates the time as slightly more than one quarter of an hour.<br />
6. See Cohen, Alfred. "Late for Shabbat". The Journal of Halakha and Contemporary Society.  Spring 2001 Vol. 41. p. 5-61; In particular pages 20-26.<br />
</span></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Laugh With The Sinners</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://joshyuter.com/archives/2009/08/laugh_with_the_sinners.php" />
    <id>tag:joshyuter.com,2009://2.465</id>

    <published>2009-08-31T00:58:25Z</published>
    <updated>2009-08-31T18:40:53Z</updated>

    <summary>My 9:00am Sunday morning shiur at The Stanton St. Shul has been discussing as of late topics in Mahchsevet Hazal / Rabbinic Thought and Theology. In today&apos;s class we were discussing various sources regarding Gehenom / Hell (PDF) in the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Josh</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Divrei Torah" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Jewish" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://joshyuter.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>My 9:00am Sunday morning <em>shiur </em>at <a href="http://www.stantonstshul.com">The Stanton St. Shul</a> has been discussing as of late topics in <em>Mahchsevet Hazal</em> / Rabbinic Thought and Theology.  In today's class we were discussing various sources regarding <a href="http://joshyuter.com/shiurim/mahshevethazal/GehenomFormatted.pdf">Gehenom / Hell</a> (PDF) in the Rabbinic tradition and we came across a fascinating contradiction in the thought of one of the Sages.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>In <a href="http://mechon-mamre.org/b/l/l4701.htm">B. Avoda Zara 18b</a> we find the following statement:<br />
<blockquote><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shimon_ben_Lakish">R. Shimon Ben Lakish</a> said: He who scoffs<sup>1</sup> will fall into <em>gehenom</em>, as it is said, A proud and haughty man, scoffer is his name, worketh for arrogant wrath (<a href="http://mechon-mamre.org/e/et/et2821.htm">Mishlei 22:24</a>).  And by 'wrath' nothing but <em>gehenom</em> is meant; as it is said, That day is a day of wrath (<a href="http://mechon-mamre.org/e/et/et2101.htm">Tzefania 1:15</a>).<sup>2</sup></blockquote></p>

<p>While the punishment for scoffers may seem severe, the Torah <em>really</em> does not suffer such people lightly.<sup>3</sup>  But the real difficulty with this Gemara is that we have a mutually contradictory statement by the same R. Shimon Ben Lakish in <a href="http://mechon-mamre.org/b/l/l3301.htm">B. Nedarim 8b</a>:<br />
<blockquote> R. Simeon b. Lakish,  said: <em>There is no gehenom in the world to come</em>, but the Holy One, blessed be He, will draw forth the sun from its sheath: the righteous shall be healed, and the wicked shall be judged and punished thereby</blockquote></p>

<p>In B. Avoda Zara 18b, Reish Lakish<sup>4</sup> says that the scoffers will inherit <em>gehenom</em>, but in B. Nedarim 8b he says that <em>gehenom</em> does not exist!</p>

<p>The astute reader may note that in B. Nedarim 8b Reish Lakish only says there is no <em>gehenom</em> in "the world to come" (<em>ein gehenom l'olam haba</em>), thus opening the possibility for some other form of <em>gehenom</em> to exist.  For example the Ran in Nedarim<sup>5</sup> explains Reish Lakish as meaning there is no <em>gehenom</em> after the resurrection of the dead (<em>ela l'atid lavo l'achar techiyat hameitim ka'amar</em>).  The Ran bases his interpretation on a variant citation of Reish Lakish from <a href="http://mechon-mamre.org/b/l/l4701.htm">B. Avoda Zara 3b</a>:<br />
<blockquote>R. Shimon Ben Lakish said, there is no gehenom in the future (<em>ein gehenom l'atid lavo</em>)...</blockquote></p>

<p>The Ran's distinction assumes a specific eschatological sequence of 1. death 2. world to come 3. resurrection, an assumption I will not address here. For our purposes he does prefer the formulation of "future" rather than "world to come."  On one hand this could be a matter of interpretive convenience - preferring the vaguer term "future" rather than specific point of "world to come" but we do find this formulation in later Midrashic texts, though not in the name of Reish Lakish (see Kohelet Rabba 1).  </p>

<p>However appealing to later Midrashic collections to evaluate the validity of one formulation over another will actually create more problems.  In Bereishit Rabba 6:5 (6:17 in Albeck), we find R. Yannai and Reish Lakish simply saying "there is no <em>gehenom</em>" (<em>ein gehenom</em>) without any further qualification!</p>

<p>As I explained in <em>shiur</em> when we find such contradictory statements in the Talmud and Rabbinic literature, there are several strategies for resolution:<br />
<ul><li><strong>Reinterpretation</strong> - This attempt was employed by the Ran we saw earlier.  Simply put, when one finds contradictory statements, reinterpret one of them to match the other.  This solution is highly speculative and unverifiable, qualities which makes it less attractive in academic circles but significantly more attractive in yeshivot.</li><br/><li><strong>Check Critical Editions for Attributions</strong> - <strike>Sadly I did not have the time or resources to do due diligence here</strike>, but one obvious solution to the contradiction in Reish Lakish is that it is possible that he did not in fact make one of the statements.  I am not making a Neusnerian argument that we should disregard all attributions, but it is not uncommon to find different attributions in other manuscripts in which case our "contribution" could just as easily been a scribal error.<br/><strong>Update 08/31/2009:</strong> I just found a <em>dikdukei soferim</em> on Avoda Zara and found no variants.</li></br/><li><strong>Someone Misheard</strong> - Speaking of mistakes, it is possible that whomever was citing an opinion misheard or misunderstood what was being said.  The Talmud is full of such disputes where students argue over what their teacher actually said.  So for example, it is theoretically possible that Reish Lakish did not in fact make the statement in B. Avoda Zara 18b, especially given that there are no parallel statements in the Talmud.  However, questioning the veracity of the transmission of the Oral Law without empirical evidence is not an academically or religiously responsible solution.</li><br/><li><strong>Rabbis are Inconsistent in Their Derashot</strong> - One of my points in the classes on <em>gehenom</em> and <em>'olam haba</em> was that when the Sages say X deserves one or the other they are not "<em>paskening</em>" i.e. invoking a judgement typically left to God.  Rather, the sages are likely sermonizing and embellishing to encourage one action and discourage other behaviors.  In this context the details of the <em>derashot</em> do not need to always match up.  I gave the example that if we take the collected the sermons of a career pulpit Rabbi and analyzed them with the same rigor that we do for Talmudic texts, we would likely find inconsistencies in the details.  In this context, the point of Reish Lakish in B. AZ 18b is not that scoffers inhereit <em>gehenom</em>, but the much simpler lesson that "scoffers are bad".</li></ul></p>

<p>In any event, I think I'm going to let the "shtick" section of the bog lie fallow for a while just in case.</p>

<p><br />
<span class="footnote"><br />
1. Meaning mocks or jokes derisively.  <br />
2. Talmudic translations are modified from Soncino for copy and pastability.<br />
3. See <a href="http://mechon-mamre.org/e/et/et1028.htm">Yeshayahu 28:14</a>, <a href="http://mechon-mamre.org/e/et/et1029.htm">29:20</a>, <a href="http://mechon-mamre.org/e/et/et2601.htm">Tehillim 1:1</a>, and throughout Mishlei.<br />
4. Abberviation of R. Shimon b. Lakish<br />
5. Thanks to Ben for pointing this out.<br />
</span></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Rabbi / Obama Health Care Conference Call</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://joshyuter.com/archives/2009/08/rabbi_obama_health_care_conference_call.php" />
    <id>tag:joshyuter.com,2009://2.464</id>

    <published>2009-08-20T01:51:12Z</published>
    <updated>2009-08-23T22:04:17Z</updated>

    <summary>Yesterday morning I was one of 1,000 Rabbis listening in on a conference call with President Obama on the hot button issue of heath care reform. The call was organized by coalition of Conservative, Reform, and Reconstructionist organizatoins including The...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Josh</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://joshyuter.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yesterday morning I was one of 1,000 Rabbis listening in on a conference call with President Obama on the hot button issue of heath care reform.  The call was organized by coalition of Conservative, Reform, and Reconstructionist organizatoins including<br />
 <a href="http://ccarnet.org/index.cfm?">The Central Conference of American Rabbis</a>, <a href="http://www.urj.org">Union for Reform Judaism</a>, <a href="http://www.rabbinicalassembly.org">Rabbinical Assembly</a>, <a href="http://www.therra.org">Reconstructionist Rabbinical Association</a>, and coordinated by the <a href="http://http://www.rac.org/">Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism</a>.  </p>

<p>Technically speaking I'm not sure I'm "supposed" to write about the call.  The intent of the call was less informative on Obama's position, but more for the Rabbis to explore how to address the health care controversy in their upcoming High Holiday sermons.  (In a nice move by Obama's handler's he began his health care discussion by referencing <a href="http://www.ou.org/chagim/roshhashannah/unetanehtext.htm"><em>unetaneh tokef</em></a>).  Nevertheless there were point which I took away from the call that I feel are worth sharing with the public at large.  </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Despite the primary focus of the call being health care, Obama introduced his remarks by reiterating his support for Israel, its security, and its democracy.  He then reiterated his push for a two-state solution, which he said was in Israel's best interest.  This of course is Obama's <a href="http://tinyurl.com/okg84x">publicly stated opinion</a>, though I'm always confused when one follows praising a democracy with an assumption that he knows what's better for the people.  </p>

<ol><li><strong>Obama is using religious organizations to promote policy</strong> - The role of religion in advocating political policy is an area in which I am both interested and concerned.  For example the religious Christian right condemns abortion and gay marriage, and effectively interject their religious beliefs into the political public square.  On the other hand, Liberal religious groups use their <a href="http://joshyuter.com/archives/2008/12/a_fair_and_ballanced_approach_to_jewish_social_justice.php">own interpretation</a> of their respective faiths to promote certain social agendas as well.  As I understood the intent of the call, the point for Obama was to have community leaders sympathetic to his agenda correct "misinformation" about his health care plan or the larger need for health care reform, in particular for use in their High Holiday sermons.  (One Rabbi even asked, "if the President were to address my congretation on the holiest day, what would he say?") To be sure, most of the Rabbis on the call probably would advocate for substantial health care reform anyway, and I do not know to what extent the President sought out religious leaders or the religious leaders proposed the audience with the President.  In either case, I find the blurring of church and state to be disconcerting not only on political grounds (and legal/tax purposes), but also for competency.  Rabbis have enough difficulty understanding the nuances and intricacies of their own religion to be promoting specific policies in areas for which they have no expertise.</li>
<br />
<li><strong>The "public option" isn't dead</strong> - One of the misconceptions Obama sought to clear up was the idea that he was interested in a government takeover of health care, but providing a marketplace for health care.  Though he did not explicitly endorse or push for a public option, he did include it as an option for increasing competition in the marketplace.</li>
<br />
<li><strong>Obama's approach to insurance is fundamentally flawed</strong> - This requires some explanation.  One of Obama's positions, <a href="http://change.gov/agenda/health_care_agenda/">stated repeatedly</a>, is that he wants a system where people are not discriminated against for having pre-existing conditions.  If he's truly advocating a marketplace for insurance, this is simply an untenable position.  The point of insurance is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insurance">risk management</a> where one pays a certain amount of money to avoid incurring a financial disaster in the future. Insurance companies, responsible for paying out policies, profit through the pooling of risk i.e the individuals with limited risk pay premiums to cover those with higher risks of the company having to pay.  If there is no discrimination for pre-existing conditions, the principle of calculating appropriate risks is eliminated since every participant would be treated as an equal.  Worse, if there is no disadvantage to pre-existing conditions, then there is no incentive for the individual to purchase insurance until <em>after</em> the health problem materializes.  At that point there is no risk from the purchaser because he knows he needs treatment, but the insurer is forced to burden the entirety of the costs.  Based on Obama's position on pre-existing conditions, I'm forced to conclude that either he really is advocating a government controlled health care (or at least mandating individuals purchasing health care), or he simply doesn't understand how insurance works.</li>
<br />
<li><strong>Stories trumping substance</strong> - Not so much of a <em>hiddush</em> here, but the strategy seems to be to use anecdotal evidence of people harmed (or not hepled) by the system to demonstrate its flaws.  It's an effective rhetorical tool and an appeal to our emotions, but the reality is in any large scope system, some will inevitably be left behind.</li>
<br />
<li><strong>Medicare is a "wild card" in the debate</strong> - By this I mean Medicare has been employed in the discussion as both a positive and negative, often in the same argument.  One of my favorites - and here I fully empathize with Obama - are the seniors who protest government involvement in health care while adamantly insisting that their Medicare not be touched.  On the other hand Obama used Medicare as an example of governement successfully running a health care initiative with lower costs.  However, despite taking up nearly 13% of our Federal Budget, Obama claimed that Medicare will run out of money in 8 years.</li></ol>

<p>Personally I found the entire experience to be enlightening in many ways - I don't even have time to discuss the "text study" which followed Obama (fascinating on many other levels but you're free to pursue them <a href="http://rac.org/Articles/index.cfm?id=3576&pge_prg_id=11452&pge_id=2415">here</a>).  I'm not sure how or if I will include any of the above into a High Holiday sermon (though I did discuss my take before my prayer class), but I will state briefly that Obama is absolutely right that not only do we need an intelligent civil debate on the issues but that we need to remember that our ultimate concern must always be the overall well-being of our fellow Americans.</p>

<p><strong>Clarification:</strong> I've received several comments asking what was the response of the listeners to some of Obama's statements.  The call was "listen-only" and we were all on mute except for the select people who were honored with asking Obama the questions.  There were only two questions asked, both of which were selected beforehand.  There was no opportunity to speak to the president directly. </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Lose Weight With Amazon! Click Here Now!</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://joshyuter.com/archives/2009/07/lose_weight_with_amazon_click_here_now.php" />
    <id>tag:joshyuter.com,2009://2.463</id>

    <published>2009-07-10T06:51:17Z</published>
    <updated>2009-07-10T06:54:03Z</updated>

    <summary>On my way to Israel I joked Twitter that I hoped I wasn&apos;t overweight in terms of luggage. The truth is I could probably stand to lose a few pounds, or at least get better about exercising. Being in Israel...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Josh</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Shtick" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://joshyuter.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>On my way to Israel I joked Twitter that I hoped I wasn't overweight in terms of luggage.  The truth is I could probably stand to lose a few pounds, or at least get better about exercising.   Being in Israel certainly helps; when I was in Gush I dropped two suit sizes largely due to walking everywhere and eating less thanks to yeshiva food.  </p>

<p>But in New York and working it's perpetually difficult to find time/space to work out.  As a Rabbi my schedule is erratic and I can't afford the gyms.  In Washington Heights I was better about jogging thanks to Ft. Tryon Park and I'm too scared to bike on the Lower East Side - try a bike land and you'll see what I mean.  Still, all these excuses don't mean anything in the long term when faced with family medical histories. </p>

<p>My sister on the other hand is amazing, juggling a household with 4 kids, a job, active in the community, and still forces herself to do something be it jogging, learning to jump rope, or basic exercises with dumbbells.  </p>

<p>Dumbbells! So simple, you can do plenty of stuff at home, a perfect solution!  In fact there was a time I had some dumbbells.  Years ago my great uncle Ben Yuter once randomly sent me two three pound dumbbells in the mail which should have made for a great conversation in the post office: "let's see how much that weighs..."  "Trust me, it's 6 pounds."</p>

<p>Before I try new stuff I typically search online to get a sense of how much things cost and what would make the best deal.<sup>1</sup>  Some sets <a href="http://www.amazon.com/15lb-Hex-Dumbbell-Pair-Rubber/dp/B001AI24NM/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=sporting-goods&qid=1247207372&sr=8-2">looked intrusting</a>, but I found something even more fascinating in the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Tools-BSTVD7-7-Pound-Dumbbell-Purple/dp/B002A4D4XY/ref=pd_ybh_6?pf_rd_p=280800601&pf_rd_s=center-2&pf_rd_t=1501&pf_rd_i=ybh&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_r=14MH383DAW2SCX5WQ2JJ">Body Solid Tools</a> line.  Sure looks like an ordinary a 7 pound dumbbell with purple coating, but the real bonus is further down the page.  In the "Product Details" section I found this gem:<br />
<blockquote>Shipping Weight: 6.4 pounds</blockquote><br />
Read that carefully: the shipping weight for a 7 pound dumbbell is 6.4 pounds.  </p>

<p>Let one think this is an anomaly, the shipping weight for a <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Solid-Tools-BSTVD6-6-Pound-Dumbbell/dp/B002A4D4XO/ref=pd_ybh_7?pf_rd_p=280800601&pf_rd_s=center-2&pf_rd_t=1501&pf_rd_i=ybh&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_r=14MH383DAW2SCX5WQ2JJ">6 pound dumbbell</a> is 5.6 pounds and the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Solid-Tools-BSTVD8-8-Pound-Dumbbell/dp/B002A49BKO/ref=pd_ybh_5?pf_rd_p=280800601&pf_rd_s=center-2&pf_rd_t=1501&pf_rd_i=ybh&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_r=14MH383DAW2SCX5WQ2JJ">8 pound</a> ships at 7.6.</p>

<p>This is nothing short of revolutionary; Amazon has created a shipping system so advanced they can alter the weight of an object. I'm now thinking why bother with working out when I can just keep shipping myself via Amazon and lose .4-.6 pounds at a clip!</p>

<p>The best part is that after $25, I can even ship for free.  Can't get a better deal than that.</p>

<p><span class="footnote"><br />
1. The "typical Jew" economics are really important when you're paid like a rabbi.  <br />
</span></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Finding &quot;Freedom&quot; and Protecting &quot;Patriotism&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://joshyuter.com/archives/2009/07/finding_freedom_and_protecting_patriotism.php" />
    <id>tag:joshyuter.com,2009://2.461</id>

    <published>2009-07-03T15:02:11Z</published>
    <updated>2009-07-03T15:38:49Z</updated>

    <summary>Every week I write a brief &quot;Rabbi&apos;s Corner&quot; for my synagogue&apos;s weekly e-mail. With the 4th of July this weekend I decided to examine the ideas of and meaning of &quot;Freedom&quot; and &quot;Patriotism&quot;. After a little searching I found a...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Josh</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://joshyuter.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Every week I write a brief "Rabbi's Corner" for <a href="http://stantonstshul.com">my synagogue's</a> weekly e-mail.  With the 4th of July this weekend I decided to examine the ideas of and meaning of "Freedom" and "Patriotism".  After a little searching I found a fascinating irony - these two terms holy contested in our perniciously partisan society both have linguistic histories conveying ideas of love and brotherhood.</p>

<p>First, according to the <a href="http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=free">Online Etymological Dictionary</a> the origins of word "Free" are rooted in a context of "love":<br />
<blockquote>O.E. <em>freo </em>"free, exempt from, not in bondage," also "noble, joyful," from P.Gmc. *<em>frijaz </em>(cf. M.H.G. <em>vri</em>, Ger. <em>frei</em>, Du. <em>vrij</em>, Goth. <em>freis </em>"free"), from PIE *<em>prijos </em>"<strong>dear, beloved</strong>" (cf. Skt. <em>priyah </em>"<strong>own, dear, beloved</strong>," <em>priyate </em>"<strong>loves</strong>;" O.C.S. <em>prijati </em>"to help," <em>prijatelji </em>"friend;" Welsh <em>rhydd </em>"free"). <strong>The adv. is from O.E. <em>freon</em>, <em>freogan </em>"to free, love." The primary sense seems to have been "beloved, friend, to love;" which in some languages (notably Gmc. and Celtic) developed also a sense of "free," perhaps from the terms "beloved" or "friend" being applied to the free members of one's clan (as opposed to slaves, cf. L. liberi, meaning both "free" and "children"). </strong>Cf. Goth. <em>frijon </em>"to love;" O.E. <em>freod </em>"affection, friendship," friga "love," friðu "peace;" O.N. <em>friðr</em>, Ger. <em>Friede </em>"peace;" O.E. <em>freo </em>"wife;" O.N. <em>Frigg </em>"wife of Odin," lit. "beloved" or "loving;" M.L.G. <em>vrien </em>"to take to wife, Du. vrijen, Ger. <em>freien </em>"to woo."</blockquote></p>

<p>The term "<a href="http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=patriot">Patriot</a>" finds its origins in the word <em>patriote</em> or "fellow countrymen", though in political terms it evolved into somewhat of an insult:<br />
<blockquote>Meaning "loyal and disinterested supporter of one's country" is attested from 1605, but became an ironic term of ridicule or abuse from mid-18c. in England, so that Johnson, who at first defined it as "one whose ruling passion is the love of his country," in his fourth edition added, "It is sometimes used for a factious disturber of the government."</p>

<p>"The name of patriot had become [c.1744] a by-word of derision. Horace Walpole scarcely exaggerated when he said that ... the most popular declaration which a candidate could make on the hustings was that he had never been and never would be a patriot." [Macaulay, "Horace Walpole," 1833]</blockquote></p>

<p>But the term Patriotism was not always an insult, nor was always used as a political sledgehammer to <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2008Feb24/0,4670,ObamaAttackFodder,00.html">sell flag pins</a>.  According to Harvey Chisick's <a href="http://www.bestwebbuys.com/9780810850972">Historical Dictionary of the Enlightenment</a>, "patriotism" could be defined as something akin social egalitarianism and justice:</p>

<blockquote>Unlike the situation in the 19th century, when nationalism tended to be exclusive and confrontational, during the 18th century patriotism belonged with such inclusive and cohesive values as <strong>humanity </strong>and <strong>beneficence</strong>.  In the course of the second half of the 18th century, a person who provided relief for the poor, or objected to excessively harsh penal laws, or who criticized institutions such as serfdom or slavery, was likely to be described as a good patriot." (p. 314) [emphasis original]</blockquote>

<p>My hope for this 4th of July our nation can look back to the history of these important words not be lost amongst the ever-spiteful partisan rhetoric which continues to divide our country.  I hope that we can spread freedom - in all senses - to our fellow citizens of the world and that we remember the message of what it once meant to be a true patriot.  </p>

<p>While I'm not optimistic, I am proud to live in a country where I have the freedom to dream.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Thinkpad Blank / Dark Screen Workaround / Solution</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://joshyuter.com/archives/2009/04/thinkpad_blank_dark_screen_workaround_solution.php" />
    <id>tag:joshyuter.com,2009://2.459</id>

    <published>2009-05-01T01:37:59Z</published>
    <updated>2009-05-06T20:19:58Z</updated>

    <summary>I just had a problem with my IBM Thinkpad1 (T60) where the screen would go dark/blank after a couple of seconds. The only way I could get anything was to keep hitting Fn+F7 as a sort of refresh, but that...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Josh</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Technology" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://joshyuter.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I just had a problem with my IBM Thinkpad<sup>1</sup> (T60) where the screen would go dark/blank after a couple of seconds.  The only way I could get anything was to keep hitting Fn+F7 as a sort of refresh, but that wouldn't last longer than seconds at best. </p>

<p>Apparently this is not an uncommon problem with Thinkpads.  One theory is that the problem is with the <a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/30750-35-thinkpad-dark-screen">inverter</a> but someone else had to <a href="http://www.pluralsight.com/community/blogs/aaron/archive/2006/01/19/18114.aspx">replace the whole screen</a>.</p>

<p>After doing some fiddling, I found that my problem was be solved - at least temporarily by dimming the screen down from full brightness.  I have no idea exactly what the problem is or why this worked, but if you're having similar trouble you may want to try dimming your screen before shelling out hundreds for a new screen - or thousands on a new computer. So far it seems to work ok for me, but I have no idea how long it will last.  Minimally it should make backing up easier while you go computer shopping.<sup>2</sup></p>

<p><br />
Please let me know if this was a helpful solution.</p>

<p><strong>Update</strong>: Turns out this solution lasted one day - a valueable day for backups, mind you, but one day.  If this works, <em>do not close the screen</em>.  </p>

<p><span class="footnote">. 1. Yep, that's right - an <em>IBM</em> Thinkpad - was one of the last runs before the change to Lenovo.<br />
2. Thankfully, I actually ordered a new Thinkpad on sale earlier in the week before the screen went dark.  I did notice some screen problems, but I was having more performance and HD issues typical of a computer several years old.    <br />
</span></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>YUTOPIA&apos;s Top A Capella Videos</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://joshyuter.com/archives/2009/04/yutopias_top_acapella_videos.php" />
    <id>tag:joshyuter.com,2009://2.456</id>

    <published>2009-04-30T14:40:49Z</published>
    <updated>2009-04-30T12:33:16Z</updated>

    <summary>During Sefirat Ha&apos;Omer, many Jews observe some customs of morning in memory of R. Akiva&apos;s students. According to Wikipedia: The period of counting the Omer is also a time of semi-mourning, during which the Halakha forbids haircuts, shaving, listening to...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Josh</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Culture" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://joshyuter.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>During Sefirat Ha'Omer, many Jews observe some customs of morning in memory of R. Akiva's students.  According to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counting_of_the_Omer#As_a_period_of_semi-mourning">Wikipedia</a>:<br />
<blockquote>The period of counting the Omer is also a time of semi-mourning, during which the Halakha forbids haircuts, shaving, listening to live instrumental music, or conducting weddings, parties, and dinners with dancing.</blockquote><br />
Of course, Halakha does not "forbid" any such actions - in fact the <em>hakahic</em> basis for mourning during the 'Omer is even more tenuous than mourning during - <a href="http://joshyuter.com/archives/2008/07/the_real_laws_of_the_three_weeks_and_nine_days.php">the three weeks and nine days</a>, but rather they are at best matters of custom.  </p>

<p>But even in matters of custom there can be multple opinions.  For example, every year I get several e-mails asking about what types of music are permitted during the 'Omer.  Some distinguish between live and recorded music, others avoid music with instruments.  While I personally find these distinctions inconsequential since the entire practice is a <a href="http://joshyuter.com/archives/2005/06/popular_practice_and_the_process_of_pesak.php">matter of custom</a>, let it not be said that here at YUTOPIA we are completely intolerant of <em>minhagim</em>.  And so in honor of Sefirat Ha'Omer, I've decided this year to compile my favorite a capella videos from YouTube.<sup>1</sup> </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Covers and Medleys</strong></p>

<p><strong>UNC Achordants - Carry on My Wayward Son (Kansas)</strong></p>

<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/oxbDMnk_Qz8&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/oxbDMnk_Qz8&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>

<p><strong>Mile 21-a - The Chain (Fleetwood Mac)</strong></p>

<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ef-gaZqhf-s&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Ef-gaZqhf-s&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>

<p><strong>University of Rochester Midnight Ramblers - Just What I Needed (The Cars)</strong></p>

<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/sfApk09Jl00&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/sfApk09Jl00&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br />
Also see their good but disturbing <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjNqxvFLCiU">Disturbia</a>.</p>

<p><strong>Oxford University's Out of the Blue - Fat Bottom Girls (Queen)</strong></p>

<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/jGux21iMulI&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/jGux21iMulI&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>

<p><strong>Casual Harmony - Karma Police (Raidiohead)</strong></p>

<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/rBKKXlb3EKs&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/rBKKXlb3EKs&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>

<p><strong>Straight No Chaser - Sitcom Theme Medley</strong></p>

<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/zMj1ZaWVc-8&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/zMj1ZaWVc-8&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br />
Also see: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/FkerzEpY-PM">Teen Sensation Medley</a></p>

<p><strong>Scrubs - Don't Fear the Reaper (Blue Oyster Cult)</strong> (Brilliantly done)</p>

<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/4kLNKTC-xy0&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/4kLNKTC-xy0&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>

<p><strong>Original Songs</strong></p>

<p><strong>Davinci's Notebook - Title of the Song</strong><br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/HGa7vqqRFOI&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/HGa7vqqRFOI&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>

<p><strong>The Klein Four Group - Finite Simply Group of Order Two</strong> (Extremely Geeky)</p>

<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/UTby_e4-Rhg&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/UTby_e4-Rhg&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>

<p><strong>Honorable Mentions</strong></p>

<ul><li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPGq5ejY1ao">UC Men's Octet - With or Without You (U2)</a></li><li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yse4gnsLwDo">CU Buffoons - Shambala/Take Me to the River (Three Dog Night / Al Green)</a></li><li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFSRRPWTyJc">Washington University' Mosaic Whispers: Suddenly I See (K.T. Tunstall)</a></li><li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ri0gNOBtoz0">Red Hot Blue - Sweet Home Alabama (Lynyrd Skynyrd)</a></li></ul>

<p>As always, suggestions welcome in the comments.</p>

<p><span class="footnotes"><br />
1. If you're wondering how I picked these particular vids, I have a few guidelines for what I was looking:<br />
<ul><li>Arrangements - the closer to the original, the better</li><li>Full and Balanced Vocals - this typically includes a good bass, though not required.  This excluded all-female groups.</li><li>Song Choice - I looked for originality and stayed away from "<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcXf9w_oPH0">Africa</a>'s", <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6rogFXucg8">Don't Stop Believing</a>, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p31v_WdNNVA">Cry Me a River</a>, and <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-hh1dkFNsI">anything involving video games</a> - no matter how good they may be.  This explains the classic rock bias.</li><li>Video Quality - I'm sure there were some better performances out there from better groups, but if the sounds quality is sub-standard then there's not much of a point.<li>Diversity - I wanted to limit selections to one per group.  Feel free to seach around for more songs from your favorite groups!</li></ul><br />
</span></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>David Ben-Gurion: Guardian of Israel</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://joshyuter.com/archives/2009/04/david_ben-gurion_guardian_of_israel.php" />
    <id>tag:joshyuter.com,2009://2.458</id>

    <published>2009-04-29T20:12:57Z</published>
    <updated>2009-04-29T20:17:36Z</updated>

    <summary>This apocryphal factoid seemed appropriate for Yom Ha&apos;atzmaut. From a 2003 Hadassah article: According to Jewish educator and comics fan and writer Alan Oirich, artist Gil Kane based his design of the large-headed, balding Guardians of the Universe in DC&apos;s...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Josh</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Culture" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Israel" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://joshyuter.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>This apocryphal factoid seemed appropriate for Yom Ha'atzmaut.  From <a href="http://www.hadassah.org/news/content/per_hadassah/archive/2003/03_JUN/art.htm">a 2003 Hadassah article</a>:<br />
<blockquote>According to Jewish educator and comics fan and writer Alan Oirich, artist Gil Kane based his design of the large-headed, balding <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guardians_of_the_Universe">Guardians of the Universe</a> in DC's Green Lantern on David Ben-Gurion. </blockquote></p>

<p>You be the judge:</p>

<p><img src="http://cdn-www.cracked.com/articleimages/dan/ripoffs/lantern5.jpg" /><br />
<span class="footnote"><br />
Image from <a href="http://www.cracked.com/article_17299_p2.html">Cracked</a><br />
</span></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>
